Home / Solutions / Contracts managers
RoleProcureAudit for Contracts Managers | Purchasing File
You are the one who has to produce the file
When somebody asks for a purchasing file it lands on you. Whether that takes an afternoon or a fortnight was decided months earlier by people who were not thinking about you at the time.
Whether the record was written at the time
You cannot fix a purchasing file after the fact. Everything that makes retrieval quick was decided by other people, months earlier, while they were doing something else.
Whether the record was written at the time
You cannot fix a purchasing file after the fact. Everything that makes retrieval quick was decided by other people, months earlier, while they were doing something else.
- Retrieval stops being a collection exercise
- You can answer without an investigation
- Gaps surface long before anybody asks

Retrieval stops being a collection exercise
Filtering a population and exporting a sample with support attached replaces asking six colleagues to search their email and hoping the results line up.

You can answer without an investigation
Who approved this, when, and against which version are all on the record, so a specific question takes one lookup rather than a chain of conversations.

Gaps surface long before anybody asks
Stalled awards and missing evidence are visible during the work, which is when fixing them is quiet and cheap rather than awkward.
Traditional handling against this approach
Producing the file is your job. Reconstructing it from scratch should not be.

Collection
Searching email, trawling drives and asking people what they remember, then discovering what was never captured at all.

A filter and an export
The population is filterable, the sample exports, and the supporting documents come attached to each record.

Interviewing colleagues
Why a supplier was chosen exists in somebody's memory, and if they have moved on it exists nowhere at all.

Reading what was written
Reasoning was captured at the decision by the person deciding, attached to the award it explains.

A trawl
Locating a specific file means understanding how somebody else filed it, which usually ends with asking them.

A filter
Documents sit against the award, modification and phase, so finding one is a search rather than an act of interpretation.

At the worst moment
A missing approval or an unrecorded modification surfaces while somebody external is waiting, which is when it costs most.

While it is still cheap
Stalled awards and missing evidence are flagged during the work rather than at the point somebody asks.
The requests that arrive without warning
The requests that arrive without warning
Filter, export, done, rather than a week of asking colleagues to search their inboxes.
- A file is requested at short notice
- Somebody questions an award decision
- An award has quietly stalled
A file is requested at short notice
Filter, export, done, rather than a week of asking colleagues to search their inboxes.
- Filter and export, not inbox chasing
- Support already attached
- Minutes rather than a week
- Nobody else asked to search
Somebody questions an award decision
Answered from the reasoning written at the time rather than from a reconstruction.
- Reasoning written at the decision
- By the person deciding
- Still readable if they left
- Answered from the record, not memory
An award has quietly stalled
Surfaced during the work rather than discovered when somebody asks about it.
- No activity flagged automatically
- Surfaced during the work
- Not found only at a review
- Week three, not week thirty
The buyer who placed it has left
Makes no difference, because nothing important lived only in their head.
- Reasoning on the award
- Evidence attached
- No interviews needed
- The record outlives the buyer
And what should happen to each

Producing the file
Yours, and it should be a search rather than a project.

Explaining a decision
Reading what was written rather than interviewing whoever remembers.

Finding a document
A filter, not a trawl through shared drives.

Chasing subcontractor paperwork
Automatic, tracked to expiry dates rather than a list you keep.

Reconstructing modification history
Should not exist as a task at all.

Discovering a gap under pressure
The worst of them, and entirely preventable upstream.
Questions from contracts managers
What changes most for a contracts manager?
Can I sample a population of awards?
What if decisions were made before we had this?
Do I need everybody else to change how they work?
How quickly can I answer a specific question?
Can I see where gaps are before somebody asks?
Does this replace our contract management system?
Other sectors and roles worth reading

Internal audit
Sampling a population and getting the support without a collection exercise.
Learn moreBring a file you had to produce recently
We will walk through what retrieving it would have looked like, including where the record would still have gaps.
Book a demo
